Maier GMBH Ventilations

Cooling Effect

Cooling Effect

Comparison
evaporative air cooler is not an air conditioner, as it does not use a compressor and Freon gas. We could not expect an Evaporative Cooler works as effectively as refrigerated air conditioner. However, compared with air conditioner the advantages of the Evaporative Air Cooler are:
  • Low purchasing cost
  • Low power consumption
  • Low installation cost
  • Green, energy-saving, eco-friendly
  • Windows and doors can be kept open
  • Multifunctional: Air cooling, ventilation, humidification, purifier
  • Widely used in indoor and outdoor applications
Comparison with other cooling & ventilation devices
TYPE EVAPORATIVE COOLER REFRIGERATIVE AIR CON CENTRIFUGAL FAN CEILING FAN
CAPACITY 18000cmh 400,000 BTU/HOUR 40,000 cmh 1400mm. Dia
POWER(kw) 1.1 54 7.5 0.075
COVER AREA (Sqm) 1000 1000 1000 1000
AIR CHANGE PER HOUR 30 0 30 0
UNITS REQUIRED 8 2 3 83
TOTAL KW 8.8kw 108.0kw 22.5kw 6.2kw
ELECTRICITY COST PER YEAR (10 HRS, 365 DAYS) 32,120 kwh 394,200 kwh 82,125 kwh 22,721 kwh
COST WITH REFERENCE TO REFRIGERATIVE AIR CON 8.15% 100% 20.83% 5.76%
Comparison with Air Conditioner
TYPE EVAPORATIVE COOLER AIR CONDITIONER
CAPACITY 3000cmh window cooler 24000 BTU split type
POWER (Kw) 0.185 kw 1 kw
COVER AREA (Sqm) 15-30 sqm 15-20 sqm
AIR CHANGE PER HOUR 30 0
UNITS REQUIRED 1 1
ELECTRICITY COST PER YEAR (10 HRS, 365 DAYS) 675 kwh 3,650 kwh
COST WHEN ELECTRICITY PRICE $0.1/kwh USD 67.5 USD 365
Temperature reduce
INTAKE AIR RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
EXIT °C / INTAKE AIR °C 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
10 3.2 4.0 4.8 5.6 6.4 7.2 8.0 8.6 9.4
15 6.6 7.8 8.8 9.8 10.8 11.7 12.6 13.4 14.3
20 10.1 11.4 12.8 13.9 15.2 16.2 17.2 18.2 19.2
25 13.4 15.0 16.6 18.0 19.4 20.6 21.8 22.9 24.0
30 16.6 18.6 20.4 22.0 23.6 25.0 26.4 27.7 28.9
35 19.8 22.2 24.2 26.2 28.0 29.6 31.0 32.4 33.7
40 23.0 25.6 28.1 30.4 32.3 33.9
45 25.9 29.2 32.0 34.3
50 29 32.7 35.8